pozeDECAT scrie:Exemplu: http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2013/ ... andscapes/
florin04 scrie:La rugamintea lui @Demential,va invit sa dezbatem conceptul "Frumusetea se afla in ochiul privitorului" si implicatiile lui in artele vizuale.
Ca un contra-argument, va prezint mai jos punctul de vedere al fotografului Michael Freeman, cu care sunt de acord:
[Sursa: Michael Freeman - The photographer's mind]
"Nevertheless, mention beauty, and the phrase that springs to almost everyone’s mind is “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” This has achieved the status of cliché to the point where few of us even think about how obviously wrong it is. It would be meaningless if only one person—one “beholder”—found a piece of art beautiful, while everyone else dismissed it. Beauty needs a consensus, or at least the possibility.
Whenever we think that we’re shooting something beautiful, or aiming for beauty, there’s an inevitable sense in the back of the mind that other people should also like the result. If they do not, then for an image it means that the taste of the photographer is not meshing with the taste of the audience. That happens often, and it may be to do with failure (the photographer is just not skillful enough) or it may be to do with matching the photography to the wrong audience.
Whether or not it plays a rôle in your photography, we ought to know the basic facts about beauty and looking good. Plato considered it to be about proportion, harmony, and unity, while Aristotle believed it concerned order, symmetry, and definiteness. These are all ideas to which most people would still give a nod. But it was the 18th-century German philosopher, Immanuel Kant, who set the path for the study of beauty and art. In particular, beauty is a value, and it is always a positive value.
Beauty in nature, which includes our famous sunsets, as well as rolling and healthy landscapes, blue seascapes, white beaches, and more, is a category that most people agree on—at least within any one culture. Signposted beauty spots and scenic viewpoints are premised on this. Plato’s ideals of proportion, harmony, and unity (that is, it all seems to fit together) are basic components for a beautiful landscape, you’ll recognize that these are qualities of the image as much as of the subject. That is because landscape is an idea that we have about terrain— it’s how we experience the geography of a place."
florin04 scrie:Riscam sa ne pierdem in discutii si sa uitam ca fotografia este unul dintre instrumentele prin care poate fi redata frumusetea lumii.
Iata mai jos un exemplu, o poza de pe net cu parcul Yosemite. Crezi ca aici se mai aplica zicala aia? Si exemplele pot continua...
Schimband registrul, atunci cand te uiti la o pictura cubista sau suprarealista iti poti pune problema de ce mie nu-mi place si altora le place sau invers.
Ca exista standarde, consens sau majoritati ... nu exclude, de plano, faptul ca frumosul e frumos, pentru privitorul individual, doar dupa ce este filtrat prin propriul simt estetic. Simtul estetic poate fi mai mult sau mai putin educat, poate fi influentat de standardele existente la un moment dat .
demential scrie:Am umblat la setari de ma dureau degetele ...
Utilizatorii ce navighează pe acest forum: Niciun utilizator înregistrat şi 23 vizitatori